National Guardsman SHOOTS Colleague After He Found THIS!

Soldiers in camouflage uniforms saluting in formation outdoors

One young soldier, one jealous rage, and one trigger pull turned a messy breakup into a federal murder case that should make every parent and commander stop and ask, “What are we teaching our sons about self-control?”

Story Snapshot

  • A Louisiana National Guardsman drove to his ex’s on base and found another soldier in her bed.
  • Minutes later, that rival lay dead, and a Georgia Army post was locked down like a war zone.
  • Prosecutors charged the shooter with murder; now he has pleaded guilty to second-degree murder.
  • The case exposes hard truths about anger, manhood, and personal responsibility in and out of uniform.[1]

A love triangle that ended in gunfire on a U.S. Army post

Federal prosecutors say it started the way too many bad stories do: a young man stewing over an ex and a late-night visit he never should have made. Natravien R. Landry, a 25-year-old Army National Guard soldier from Abbeville, Louisiana, drove to post housing at what was then Fort Gordon in Augusta, Georgia, to see a woman he shared a child with.[3] Inside, he found another soldier, Sergeant Andre S. Stewart Jr., in bed with her.[2] Within moments, words turned to violence and shots were fired.

The United States Attorney’s Office says Landry assaulted and then shot the man who was with the woman in her residence on the installation.[1][3] The military community went from weekend routine to emergency status as the base locked down and law enforcement swarmed. Stewart, an active-duty United States Army sergeant, never made it out alive. What began as a private relationship dispute inside government housing became a federal homicide investigation on a sensitive military post.[1]

From murder charge to guilty plea and a lifetime on the line

Within days, federal prosecutors charged Landry with murder under United States law, not just a state crime.[1] The charge reflected what the government said happened: an intentional, unlawful killing, not an accident and not self-defense. He was arrested after a traffic stop and brought into court in the Southern District of Georgia to face the first, blunt version of the case against him. The early filings showed the government believed he chose to shoot, and chose to shoot more than once.[1][3]

Fast forward: Landry is no longer fighting over “if” he killed Stewart. The United States Department of Justice now says he has pleaded guilty to murder in the second degree and to using a firearm during a crime of violence in the shooting death of Sergeant Stewart. That single choice in the courtroom may cost him the rest of his free life. The government says he now faces a mandatory minimum of ten years in federal prison and up to life behind bars.

What second-degree murder tells us about anger and intent

Second-degree murder is not a “heat of the moment” excuse. It is the law’s way of saying, “You meant to do something deadly, even if you did not plan it days ahead.” Prosecutors did not treat this as a tragic accident or a split-second self-defense shot. They treated it as an intentional killing born out of rage over a relationship, and Landry’s own plea now accepts that level of blame.[1] In plain language, he admitted he crossed a line no adult, much less a trained soldier, can cross and still claim honor.

Some commentators call these cases “crimes of passion,” as if strong emotion turns a man into a victim of his own feelings. That framing does not square with conservative values of self-control and personal responsibility. The gun did not drive itself to that home, walk into that bedroom, or fire itself. A trained National Guardsman did. When a man decides that wounded pride and jealousy justify deadly force, the law must answer clearly, or the culture will learn the wrong lesson.[2]

The deeper problem: fragile egos, lethal tools, and a culture that winks at rage

This case also fits a wider pattern in modern America: unstable personal lives colliding with ready access to weapons and a “do what you feel” culture. Landry and the woman shared a child, but they were no longer together.[2][3] He still walked into her home, saw a scene he hated, and let anger steer the next few seconds of his life. Many men feel that sting; very few pick up a gun. The difference is character, not circumstance, and character is built long before any love triangle.[2]

Military service used to be a place where young men learned discipline, delayed gratification, and how to master anger. Most still do. But when the system lowers standards, looks the other way on personal chaos, or treats “emotional health” as a slogan instead of a hard demand, stories like this slip through. A Georgia base went on lockdown. A family buried a sergeant. Another family will visit a federal prison for decades. Actions had consequences, as they always do, even when our culture pretends they do not.[1][3]

Sources:

[1] Web – National Guardsman pleads guilty to fatal shooting of soldier he found …

[2] Web – National Guard soldier appears in court on murder charge

[3] Web – National Guard Soldier Charged with Murder in Lethal Love Triangle

© restoreamericanglory.com 2026. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

Featured on Restore American Glory

© 2026 Restore American Glory. All Rights Reserved.