FBI Cover-Up EXPOSED: Lynch’s Clinton Deal

A man in a suit holding an FBI identification card while making a shushing gesture

The FBI never properly investigated credible evidence suggesting Obama’s Attorney General Loretta Lynch secretly assured Clinton allies that the Hillary email investigation would be buried, leaving Americans wondering what else the deep state covered up.

Story Highlights

  • Intelligence suggested Lynch privately assured Clinton campaign the FBI investigation would go nowhere
  • FBI Director Comey testified Lynch’s interference gave him a “queasy feeling” about DOJ credibility
  • Senate Judiciary Committee launched inquiry but no formal wrongdoing findings were ever released
  • The controversial tarmac meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton raised additional impartiality concerns

Lynch’s Alleged Backroom Assurances

Intelligence reports surfaced in 2017 indicating Attorney General Loretta Lynch may have privately assured Clinton campaign allies that the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server would not result in serious consequences. The intelligence, reportedly obtained through Dutch sources monitoring Russian hackers, suggested Lynch told Clinton aide Amanda Renteria the investigation would not “go too far.” This explosive allegation prompted the Senate Judiciary Committee to launch an inquiry into possible DOJ interference in what should have been an impartial investigation.

Comey’s Disturbing Testimony About DOJ Pressure

FBI Director James Comey later testified that Lynch’s conduct during the Clinton investigation gave him serious concerns about DOJ credibility. Lynch instructed Comey to refer to the probe as a “matter” rather than an “investigation,” matching Clinton campaign talking points and creating what Comey described as a “queasy feeling.” This semantic manipulation suggested the Attorney General was more concerned with political optics than pursuing justice, undermining the FBI’s independence and integrity in handling classified material violations.

The Infamous Tarmac Meeting

Lynch’s credibility took another major hit when she met privately with former President Bill Clinton on a Phoenix airport tarmac in June 2016, just days before the FBI announced its recommendation. The timing raised immediate red flags about potential coordination between the Clinton political machine and Obama’s Justice Department. Lynch claimed they only discussed grandchildren and golf, but the optics were devastating for an investigation that required complete impartiality to maintain public trust.

Senate Investigation Yields No Accountability

Despite the Senate Judiciary Committee’s 2017 inquiry into Lynch’s alleged assurances and interference, no formal findings of wrongdoing were ever published. Lynch’s spokesperson denied any improper conduct and claimed full cooperation with the investigation. However, the lack of transparency and accountability left serious questions unanswered about whether the Obama administration’s top law enforcement official compromised the integrity of a high-profile investigation involving classified national security information. The American people deserved better than backroom deals protecting political elites.

This episode represents everything wrong with the Washington swamp – unelected bureaucrats protecting their political allies while ordinary Americans face the full weight of the law. The evidence suggests a coordinated effort to shield Hillary Clinton from accountability, undermining the rule of law and equal justice that our Constitution demands.

Sources:

Senate Judiciary Committee investigates Lynch

Lynch closes Clinton email case

Hillary Clinton email controversy

Lynch on not overruling FBI

Comey on Lynch’s credibility gap