Saving GRACE – Trump Handed HUGE Win!

Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 3.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

( – In a significant development in the Justice Department’s classified documents case against former President Donald Trump, Judge Aileen Cannon of Florida made a crucial decision by rejecting the government’s motion to keep the witness list confidential and concealed from Trump’s legal team. The government’s request included a substantial list of 84 potential witnesses and sought to delay the trial. To address matters related to the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA), a pretrial hearing was also scheduled.

Judge Cannon, in her order on Monday, presented a compelling argument, highlighting the absence of any explanation provided by the government as to why the witness list needed to be filed with the Court or maintained under seal, hidden from public view. Moreover, the motion failed to offer a justification as to why alternative measures, such as partial sealing or redaction, would not sufficiently address the requirements of the case. Surprisingly, the proposed duration for keeping the list sealed was not specified either, leaving crucial details unaddressed.

Adding another layer of complexity to the case, former President Trump finds himself restricted from communicating with his aide, Walt Nauta, who is facing charges in connection with the same matter. Furthermore, Trump is expressly prohibited from engaging in any discussions pertaining to the ongoing case with the witnesses involved.

In a noteworthy observation, Judge Cannon also underscored the concerns raised by news organizations regarding the potential repercussions of keeping the witness list under seal. The judge invoked the First Amendment, drawing attention to the constitutional importance of transparency and freedom of the press. In a coordinated effort to challenge the government’s request for secrecy, prominent media outlets such as The New York Times, CNN, and The Washington Post swiftly filed a motion on Monday, vehemently opposing the sealing of the filing.

The courtroom drama surrounding this high-profile case continues to unfold, with Judge Cannon’s ruling serving as a significant setback for the government’s attempts to withhold information from Trump’s legal team. As the proceedings progress, the decision to deny the sealing of the witness list raises further questions about the transparency and openness of the trial, while also highlighting the intricate balance between national security concerns and the principles of due process and public accountability.

Copyright 2023,