Collins and Paul in Hot Seat Over Tariff Dispute Within GOP

Republican elephant button on American flag background.

Four Republican senators defy President Trump and party leaders by joining Democrats in a Senate vote to block controversial tariffs on Canadian imports.

Quick Takes

The Senate approved a measure to block Trump’s tariffs on Canada with a 51-48 vote, with four Republican senators breaking ranks.
Senators Susan Collins, Rand Paul, Lisa Murkowski, and Mitch McConnell joined Democrats to support the resolution against the national emergency declaration.
Trump strongly criticized the GOP defectors on social media, accusing them of enabling drug cartels and “playing into the hands of Radical Left Democrats.”
While passed in the Senate, the resolution faces slim chances in the House, effectively making the vote largely symbolic.
The tariff dispute highlights growing divisions within the Republican party over trade policy and presidential emergency powers.

GOP Senators Break Ranks on Canada Tariffs

In a rare display of Republican division, the Senate approved a Democratic-led measure to block President Trump’s tariffs on Canada by a vote of 51 to 48. Four Republican senators – Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska – joined with Democrats to support the resolution. Spearheaded by Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, the measure aims to terminate the national emergency declaration that President Trump used as justification for imposing the controversial tariffs on Canadian goods, which he has argued are necessary for border security and stopping fentanyl trafficking.

“Imposing tariffs on Canada, which is our closest neighbor, a friendly ally, is a huge mistake and will cause disruption in the economies of both countries,” said Collins, who has been particularly vocal about her opposition to the tariffs. Her state of Maine shares a significant border with Canada and relies heavily on cross-border trade. Collins has argued that while fentanyl trafficking is a serious issue, the flow of the deadly drug from Canada represents only a fraction of what comes across the southern border with Mexico.

51-48: The Senate passes a resolution to block Trump's tariffs on Canada.

4 Republicans joined Democrats in voting yes:
• Susan Collins
• Mitch McConnell
• Lisa Murkowski
• Rand Paul

The measure is not expected to get a vote in the House. pic.twitter.com/gHtQaU6Tti

— The Recount (@therecount) April 2, 2025

Trump and GOP Leadership Push Back

President Trump wasted no time in condemning the Republican senators who broke ranks. In a late-night post on Truth Social, he urged Republican senators to maintain unity and support his tariff policy. Trump’s message was clear and pointed directly at the four defectors. “Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Rand Paul, also of Kentucky, will hopefully get on the Republican bandwagon, for a change,” Trump wrote, suggesting their opposition stemmed from personal animosity rather than policy disagreement.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso staunchly defended the emergency declaration. They emphasized the growing security concerns at the northern border, pointing to an increase in encounters with terror suspects and drug smuggling operations. Barrasso took to the Senate floor to make his case, stressing that the tariffs were a necessary tool in the administration’s border security strategy. His argument underscored the Republican leadership’s alignment with Trump on using economic pressure to address national security issues.

Principled Opposition or Political Maneuver?

Senator Rand Paul’s opposition to the tariffs stems from his long-held libertarian principles regarding free trade and the limitations of executive power. Paul has consistently argued that tariffs function as taxes on American consumers and that such measures should require congressional approval rather than being implemented through emergency declarations. His position aligns with his record of opposing expanded presidential authorities, regardless of which party controls the White House. This principled stance has often put him at odds with his party’s leadership on trade and foreign policy matters.

Democrats seized on the Republican division, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer urging more GOP senators to cross party lines. “Every single Senate Republican should support Tim’s resolution, and support American families,” Schumer declared on the Senate floor. The Democrats have framed the tariffs as an economic burden on American households, arguing they function as a tax increase during already challenging economic times. Despite winning this symbolic victory in the Senate, however, the resolution faces a steep uphill battle, as Republican House leadership has indicated they will not consider the measure.

Border Security and National Interests

The White House has defended the emergency declaration and resulting tariffs by citing increased fentanyl production in Canada and potential security threats from the northern border. According to Senate leadership, Customs and Border Protection reported seizing nearly 50,000 pounds of fentanyl over the past two fiscal years. Senate Majority Whip Barrasso emphasized this point by noting, “The northern border is now a hotspot for terror suspects and drug cartels. One hundred forty-three terror suspects were already caught this year at our northern border by Border Patrol agents. That is a threat to the safety of our communities.”

The controversy comes as President Trump has signaled plans to announce additional “reciprocal tariffs” and potentially further levies on Mexico and China. With this vote exposing cracks in Republican unity on trade policy, the administration may face continued challenges as it implements its broader economic agenda. Though the House is unlikely to take up the resolution and Trump has promised a veto should it reach his desk, the Senate vote nonetheless stands as a rare rebuke from members of the president’s own party on a signature policy issue.